• Home
  • Reviews
  • Featured
  • Archives
  • Videos
  • Devices
  • Tegra
  • Send Tips
  • Contact
  • AndroidCommunity on Twitter AndroidCommunity on Facebook AndroidCommunity on Google+ AndroidCommunity RSS Feed

Android Community

    • MUST READ

      STORIES

    • Google+ Hangouts app update adds tablet support

      May 17, 2013

    • Skobbler for Android update adds turn-by-turn navigation

      May 17, 2013

    • Sony Xperia Tablet Z added to Android Open Source Project

      May 17, 2013

  • Trending Topics
  • Jelly Bean
  • NVIDIA
  • Galaxy S 4
  • HTC One
  • Nexus 7
  • Sell Your Used Phone

Samsung delays Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 to add quad-core processor

8
  • By Michael Crider
  • on 17 Apr, 2012

Samsung delays Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 to add quad-core processor

When Samsung showed off the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 at Mobile World Congress, it was met with a resounding yawn. Aside from Ice Cream Sandwich, a MicroSD card slot and a slightly redesigned exterior, it was basically identical to the previous generation. But according to German site NetbookNews, the tablet has been delayed in order to get a more substantial upgrade: a quad-core Exynos processor. That would be a major win for anyone wanting some substantial performance gains over last year’s Galaxy Tab 10.1, and may be enough to warrant a second look from those dazzled by the Tegra and Snapdragon processors on other tablets.

The move mirrors the delay of the more well-received Galaxy Note 10.1, which was also upgraded to a quad-core Exynos chip. Both tablets were shown off at Mobile World Congress in a somewhat pre-production form, and rumor has it that the Galaxy Note 10.1 may be getting some more substantial revisions as well. Samsung is competing with price as well as features – the retail cost for the cheapest Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 is expected to be $399, a hundred dollars lower than the original, though you’re bumped down to 8GB of storage for the savings.

There’s no official word from Samsung on the change, though the source claims a tipster inside Samsung South Korea. This news comes after new Samsung tablets under an “Espresso” brand were revealed in a leaked document. Could the vanilla Tegra 2 Galaxy Tabs be re-branded, with the quad-core versions getting the an upgrade? What would this do to Samsung’s pricing scheme? At this point there isn’t enough information to draw serious conclusions, but more low-end options in addition to tablets for speed demons would definitely be to Samsung’s benefit. Also note the rumors of the Galaxy S III, which may also pack a quad-core Samsung processor.

Story Timeline

  • Samsung shows off Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 - Ice Cream Sandwich and not much else
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 clears FCC en route to AT&T
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 delayed to June, getting upgrade to Exynos quad-core
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1) leak suggests $399 price tag
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 may get redesign before release
[via SlashGear]
Share
  • New Nexus 7 outed in Google Hangouts video
  • Verizon HTC One talk returns as the HTC PN073XX surfaces
  • Easter Eggs and Ponies found in the new Google Hangouts

Tags: Exynosquad-coreSamsungSamsung Galaxy Tab 2Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1

  • Phone_Junkie

    Samsung should have planned on a processor spec’d like this from the beginning.  End of story.

  • Jesslyn Hendrix

    What this delay means for me is that they probably won’t be updating my GTab 8.9 to ICS til then.  Ugh.

  • Jeff Metzger

    I second that. Did Samsung really think they could just make a few minor tweaks to the 10.1 without changing the processor and call it 10.1 2 (or whatever)? Why would you buy it over the original?

  • Jeff Metzger

    Also, I think ASUS is the tablet to get just based on support and updates. 

  • MargaretNKinnley

    Great stuff, i hpoe it happeneds

    http://goo.gl/V1T58

  • An Observer

    A hd screen at 1920 x 1280 would go nicely with that quad core Exynos. . .

  • Doctoresam

    The problem is not the hardware , the problem is android itself.

  • Sperrybird

    If they could keep the price below 300 bux, it would be an instant hit. 

  • Search

  • REVIEWS

    • AT&T LG Optimus G Pro ReviewAT&T LG Optimus G Pro Review
    • Iron Man 3 game Review: what you need to knowIron Man 3 game Review: what you need to know
    • Samsung GALAXY S 4 ReviewSamsung GALAXY S 4 Review
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 ReviewSamsung Galaxy Note 8.0 Review
    • Pebble review: Two weeks with a smartwatchPebble review: Two weeks with a smartwatch
  • HANDS-ON & QUICK LOOKS

    • Google+ Hangouts app goes live, we go hands-onGoogle+ Hangouts app goes live, we go hands-on
    • Flipboard magazines arrive with v2.0 update, we go hands-onFlipboard magazines arrive with v2.0 update, we go hands-on
    • Lenovo IdeaCentre Horizon hands-on with BlueStacks for Android gamingLenovo IdeaCentre Horizon hands-on with BlueStacks for Android gaming


  • T-Mobile G1 Accessories
  • RECENT COMMENTS

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise

Copyright 2013 Android Community