Join the Talk | 70,021 members - 273,088 posts Advertise | Have a scoop? Tip us!

To all Android Developers: Either Agree to the New Terms or Google will Unpublish your app

11 November 2009 by Juventino Quinones


Worth Reading?

NoYes

+4 [12 votes]


Since yesterday, Android Market developers have received a not so happy email, at least not happy for many of them I would think. You see, Google has just made a few changes to the distribution agreement for the Android Market. According to Google, the new changes on the agreement have to be accepted by all developers, if they want their applications to be distributed through the Android Market.

AndroidMarket

Android Market Developers will have to accept the new agreement, yes, every single one of them. If they want to keep on making Android applications, they must agree with the new changes within the following 30 days. So it looks like December 11th is the last day. And if devs do not comply, Google says that it plans to remove their apps from the Android Market.

Below is the email that Android Market Developers have received from Google’s Android Market Team:

You are receiving this email because you have applications published in Android Market.

We’d like to let you know that there is a new Developer Distribution Agreement (DDA) for Android Market. The next time you sign in to the Android Market publisher website, you’ll be asked to agree to these new terms before continuing. If you have not accepted the new DDA by Friday, December 11, 2009 12:00:00 AM Pacific Standard Time, your application(s) will be unpublished from the Android Market.

You can view and accept the new agreement by visiting http://market.android.com/publish/ddaUpdate. Please do not reply to this message.

Thanks,
The Android Market Team

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Wikio
  1. A little harsh, don't you think. They are getting more like Microsoft every day.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ggrant3876 View Post
    A little harsh, don't you think. They are getting more like Microsoft every day.
    It's not harsh, they're doing it based on legal telling them to. Apple and others do similar things.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scythe View Post
    It's not harsh, they're doing it based on legal telling them to. Apple and others do similar things.
    I know Apple and others do it, but we are not Apple.
  4. That's standard procedure for any service. Take a look at credit cards; mine decided to impose an annual fee unless I cancel it (guess what I'll be doing...)

    What I don't like is that Google doesn't bother to outline for you what's changed; you have to re-read the whole agreement. I've got better things to do with my time.

    I found a discussion of the changes here: http://groups.google.com/group/andro...8f370d3ea6ca75
  5. What's so bad about the terms of the new contract? And, surely the devs can force more negotiation?
  6. Considering that unlike Apple products, you can install apps outside of the marketplace, I see that this makes little difference.
  7. I'll only care if the new terms of service include no soundboards or fart applications. etc etc.

    I couldn't find the article to read the new dda but eh the devs are already hating new Android phones and this isn't gonna excite anyone either.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by divestoclimb View Post
    I found a discussion of the changes here: http://groups.google.com/group/andro...8f370d3ea6ca75
    snipped from that

    Quote:
    *** Biggest problem - changes to 7.1 & 7.2 ***
    In the new agreement 7.2 states;
    "If you remove a Product from the Market pursuant to clauses (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of this Section 7.1, and an end user purchased such Product within a year before the date of takedown, at Google’s request, you must refund to the affected end user all amounts paid by such end user for such affected Product, less the portion of the Transaction Fee specifically allocated to the credit card/payment processing for the associated transaction."

    And in 7.2 the one year of sales rule pops up again;
    "In the event that your Product is involuntarily removed because it is defective, malicious, infringes intellectual property rights of another person, defames, violates a third party’s right of publicity or privacy, or does not comply with applicable law, and an end user purchased such Product within a year before the date of takedown,i) you must refund to Google, all amounts received, plus any associated fees (i.e. chargebacks and payment transaction fees), and (ii) Google may, at its sole discretion, withhold from your future sales the amount in subsection (i) above. "
    this seems quite fair for paid apps from a consumers point of view.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ggrant3876 View Post
    I know Apple and others do it, but we are not Apple.
    You're right, Google isn't a multi-billion dollar company that has legalities in mind

    Corporate is corporate...
  10. This seems like an odd choice for front page news.

    Developers already know this, we got our emails yesterday.

    ..and it's of little or no consequence to the end users.

    Anyway,.. i don't think there's anything too earth shattering in there. It seems they *may* have extended the refund period to 2 days(i believe it was 1 before), made a no refund rule for things like ringtones(again, this may have been there before), and perhaps raised awareness that they might use your promo images in the new market header.

    Nothing too exciting, basic legal stuff.
  11. It's control, but less harsh than Apple. When you log into ADC and try to goto iTunes connect, it forces the agreement before loading the connect page--you basically need to check the agreement. I have yet to get an email from ADC on a heads up update to their dev agreement.

    Yes, a lot of devs may get upset at more legal stuff, but if Google realizes that 100K apps is just a advertisement and not a sign of quality and usability and that agreement updates result in a more cleaner appstore and less crap apps (i.e. really kick out the fluff devs unfortunately, or fortunately?) that's good thing in the long run.

    In order for the google appstore to be better (aside from the lower $25 fee) than anything out there: they need a quicker way to remove apps that really shouldn't be there (dups, crap, etc..)
Join AndroidCommunity Forums

Android Phone Accessories


T-Mobile G1 Accessories
Palm Pre Accessories
iPod Touch Accessories
Advertise with SlashGear
Free Tech Support at SlashGear Forums

© 2009 Android Community. Part of R3 Media Network

Contact | Advertising | About Us