• Home
  • Reviews
  • Featured
  • Archives
  • Videos
  • Devices
  • Tegra
  • Send Tips
  • Contact
  • AndroidCommunity on Twitter AndroidCommunity on Facebook AndroidCommunity on Google+ AndroidCommunity RSS Feed

Android Community

    • MUST READ

      STORIES

    • Google Drive Android app update brings document scanning with OCR

      May 22, 2013

    • Verizon HTC One tipped for CTIA event unveiling

      May 22, 2013

    • Samsung GALAXY S 4 launching with Cricket Wireless in early June

      May 22, 2013

  • Trending Topics
  • Jelly Bean
  • NVIDIA
  • Galaxy S 4
  • HTC One
  • Nexus 7
  • Sell Your Used Phone

iPhone trademark not exclusive to Apple in Brazil

0
  • By Brian Sin
  • on 13 Feb, 2013

iPhone trademark not exclusive to Apple in Brazil

As of right now, Gradiente Electronica can legally sell their Android smartphone with the “iPhone” name. A court decision was made that ruled that Apple doesn’t have exclusive rights to the “iPhone” trademark in Brazil. The reason for this is because Gradiente Electronica actually registered the iPhone name way back in the year 2000, 7 years before Apple claimed it.

iPhone trademark not exclusive to Apple in Brazil

Gradiente Electronica’s Android device is called the iPhone Neo One and they had just released it in December 2012. Apple feels that they can use that against them in an appeal, because Gradiente didn’t release a product with the “iPhone” name until 12 years after they had registered it. Things could also turn on Apple if Gradiente decides to sue for exclusive rights to the “iPhone” name themselves.

Gradiente had stated before that they’re open to discussing the issue with Apple if Apple wanted. They’re not opposed to any agreements. However, if Gradiente does sue Apple for exclusive rights to the “iPhone” trademark, that would result from Apple not being able to sell any of their iPhone products (iPhone 5, iPhone 4S, etc) in the country of Brazil.

Despite a possible lawsuit from Gradiente, Apple will continue to pursue an appeal. There’s a good chance that they may be approved for an appeal, and that will result in another long, trademark battle between the two companies. It feels like Apple should have its own law firm considering how many legal battles they’ve entered into just this past year.

Story Timeline

  • Samsung takes yet another jab at the iPhone 5
  • Samsung Galaxy SIII Display Specs Edge Out iPhone 5
  • Samsung strikes Apple with iPhone 5 lawsuit and freed Galaxy Tab 10.1
  • iPhone 5 cuts into Android market share in US and UK, Android still on top
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II tops iPhone 5 in US smartphone survey
[via SlashGear]
Share
  • Student wins science fair with 30-second phone battery charger
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 with Android 4.3 spotted in benchmark results
  • Verizon HTC One reality returns as DROID DNA offer pops up

Tags: AndroidAppleGoogleiphone

  • Search

  • REVIEWS

    • AT&T LG Optimus G Pro ReviewAT&T LG Optimus G Pro Review
    • Iron Man 3 game Review: what you need to knowIron Man 3 game Review: what you need to know
    • Samsung GALAXY S 4 ReviewSamsung GALAXY S 4 Review
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 ReviewSamsung Galaxy Note 8.0 Review
    • Pebble review: Two weeks with a smartwatchPebble review: Two weeks with a smartwatch
  • HANDS-ON & QUICK LOOKS

    • Opera for Android exits beta, we go hands onOpera for Android exits beta, we go hands on
    • NVIDIA Tegra 4i demos i500 LTE modem on Cat 4: 150Mbps of speedNVIDIA Tegra 4i demos i500 LTE modem on Cat 4: 150Mbps of speed
    • HP Slatebook x2 Tablet hands-onHP Slatebook x2 Tablet hands-on


  • T-Mobile G1 Accessories
  • RECENT COMMENTS

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise

Copyright 2013 Android Community