Join the Talk | 87,717 members - 320,798 posts Featured Stories |4G | Advertise | Have a scoop? Tip us!

Google Unveils Licensing Software for Applications

27 July 2010 by Evan Selleck



Sometimes, you just don’t want to pay for an application. Even if it’s not the most expensive app out there, sometimes you just don’t want to drop the cash to get your hands on it. That doesn’t mean you don’t want the app — just that you don’t want to pay for it. So, if you can type a search into Google and find the APK file for that particular paid Android application, it won’t take much time at all to get it onto your device, minus the price tag. (That doesn’t count AT&T Android-based handsets, mind you.) But, it looks like that’s about to change, thanks to Google.

Google has just announced that they are going to allow developers to use a brand new licensing software for their paid applications, made available through the Android Market. Basically, this means that getting a pirated copy of any paid application that takes advantage of this software is going to be increasingly difficult. If at all possible.

It works, because the application will call upon a Google server to check the application against purchase records, versus the credentials of that purchase. So, if it isn’t you that bought the app, it will reportedly just not function as it should, if at all, on your device. While there’s the current copy-protection made through the Android Market, it’s obviously not doing the job well enough. Now, we just hope that it checks all of the purchase history against the particular Google account, and not just the device. Lest we lose all our paid apps when we get a new phone. What do you think of this move from Google? Are the open doors closing a bit?

[via Android Developer's Blog]

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • email
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Wikio
  1. I do not see this as the doors closing. The Android platform as a whole does a great job at being an open community. The OHA attempts to standardize open hardware, developers are generally open, there is a strong developer following and Google has an open-minded and open source attitude.

    I view this added layer of security as protection for developers. I think this will be a good move for Android because it will reassure developers and give them confidence that people are paying for their apps when they should be. I would not like to be a developer and have a large chunk of people running pirated versions.

    Although this will most likely piss people off... those are the people who are only complaining because the added security will prevent them from back-dooring the market and ripping .apk files to load paid apps for free.

    I think developers will rejoice when they hear this. And you gotta give love back to your developers for all the hard work they do!
  2. What if hackers replace

    CallAndroidProtection();

    with

    // CallAndroidProtection();

    ?
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by poldie View Post
    What if hackers replace

    CallAndroidProtection();

    with

    // CallAndroidProtection();

    ?
    LOL!!! classic!

    [realistically... I would assume the application would not be authenticated, and therefore not work, if someone would do that]
  4. I think it's good idea, what they are basically doing is putting a stop to theft of services. When the dev's apps get ripped off they tend to leave the market. I think because of this we will start seeing alot betters apps being made for android.
  5. Unless this is limited to say .. every 30 times the app is started then I can see this causing data usage to go up. I start up FeedR at least 15 times a day to check rss feeds from various sites. I don't want it " phoning home " everytime. (pun intended)
  6. Aergern. Its up to the developer to decide how often it phones home and then I suspect it is up to the market rating to keep that number in check. I do not know however how it will work when no network is available and the app is asking to phone home?
  7. I don't know if the app will constantly phone home... or if it will just phone home to authenticate when the app gets installed.
  8. If they can do this without disabling my apps when I'm without signal, or breaking apps like titanium backup I'm all for it.
  9. I don't mind paying for apps especially since you can return it if you don't want it

    Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
  10. I guess I don't understand the mentality: First, we bought a not-cheap smartphone, and we're paying a similarly not-cheap monthly access fee, plus a broadband fee. Many of us think nothing of spending $4-5 a day at Starbucks or some other premium coffee stop, but the idea of paying $0.99, $1.99, $2.99 or even $4.99 for something we will use daily or weekly incites us to what is basically thievery.

    Call me naive or stupid, but I just don't get it. "Open source" does NOT mean "free, or free to steal."
  11. It's not naive or stupid it's honest and appreciative of work / effort ..
  12. If you like an App, Buy it.. Dev's like Lilhermit of Trackball Alert Pro, or of Taskiller, or Titanium Backup. They update often and they are great dev's. I've paid for all of them. they require a license to fully use though, so you can't steal it

Android Phone Accessories


Content Delivery Network
T-Mobile G1 Accessories
Palm Pre Accessories

© 2010 Android Community. Part of R3 Media Network

Contact | Advertising | About Us