
Originally Posted by
JoePete
Talk about the sophomoric leading the naive, and then blasting each other for it.
I can think of a few reasons to try to limit or eliminate the gmail backend, privacy being a big issue. I mean you all have read the Google Privacy Policy and the particular privacy practices of its some 56 subsidiary or affiliated services - come on now, just as WE all researched the Android OS, I am sure YOU all researched Google's privacy policy. Second, eliminating certain parts of the Google backend reduce the number of background services and communication back and forth; in short enhance performance and battery life. Third, the Google app is not always the cat's meow. Google Groups is horrendous compared to a decent newsreader, and Gmail, while it has many nice features, lacks compared to several mail clients in an ability to create sophisticated filters or scripts - such as those of in the open-source community have come to celebrate.
This leads to the other ridiculous sniping going on here. I believe the original poster was fair in his connecting the rather closed nature of Android OS and Google backend with a philosophy that seemed anti-open-source. Back up for a moment: All you Mensa candidates so quick to quibble here, let me ask you: How does Google make money? Primarily through their stock value (shareholder impression) and advertising (which drives shareholder impression). They are not providing their services out of the goodness of their heart. They are one giant market research company. Now the fact that they are using relatively open tools to do it is great, but in the end, their data is a proprietary product. Let's call a spade a spade here.
Bookmarks