• Home
  • Reviews
  • Featured
  • Archives
  • Videos
  • Devices
  • Tegra
  • Send Tips
  • Contact
  • AndroidCommunity on Twitter AndroidCommunity on Facebook AndroidCommunity on Google+ AndroidCommunity RSS Feed

Android Community

    • MUST READ

      STORIES

    • Galaxy S III and DROID DNA discounts coming to Best Buy

      May 24, 2013

    • ZTE Grand S US release pushed until 2014

      May 24, 2013

    • Verizon Samsung GALAXY S 4 hands-on and unboxing

      May 24, 2013

  • Trending Topics
  • Jelly Bean
  • NVIDIA
  • Galaxy S 4
  • HTC One
  • Nexus 7
  • Sell Your Used Phone

Apple’s Tim Cook may not have wanted war with Samsung

4
  • By Robert Nelson
  • on 11 Feb, 2013

Apple’s Tim Cook may not have wanted war with Samsung

The court cases seem to be siding with Samsung as of late. We recently commented as Apple lost in their effort to overturn the Galaxy Nexus sales ban. Basically, at this point the fights between Samsung and Apple just happen to be part of the norm in the tech world. The thing is, it seems that this may not have ever happened had someone else been in charge at Apple.

tim_cook_apple

This latest round of details are coming by way of Reuters, who are reporting based on people familiar with the matter. The main point here, it seems Tim Cook was opposed to suing Samsung. His reasoning is said to be due to the relationship that Apple and Samsung have in terms of parts. Samsung actually plays a rather big role in terms of the iPad and iPhone and Apple purchased around $8 billion in parts last year.

The interesting part here, while we see many Android and iOS users taking sides and seemingly drawing lines, the two companies are not that heated. It is said that “the business reality is that the temperature isn’t that high” and basically, it is the users playing this up because “it shows a kind of drama.”

Nonetheless, there are some issues between the two companies. In fact, it is looking like Apple may be switching to TSMC when it comes to processors. The memory on the other hand, analyst reports have shown that Apple may not be able to replace Samsung given their current dominance in that area.

In hind site, some of this actually makes quite a bit of sense. For one, many are familiar with the stance that Steve Jobs took, the whole “thermonuclear” war bit and all. Tim Cook on the other hand seems to take a different approach and has been known to comment about how competition is good because it can make everyone better. All said and done, we are a bit curious as to how things between Apple and Samsung would be had the lawsuits never begun.

Story Timeline

  • IDC: Strong demand for smartphones with Samsung leading the charge
  • Samsung Q4 2012 earnings report shows a profit of more than $8 billion
  • Samsung recommended more than Apple by UK retailers
  • Samsung's infringement of Apple patents declared not willful
  • Samsung shells out $58.9 million for a 5% stake in Wacom
  • IDC: Samsung and Asus tablet sales showing huge year-over-year growth
  • Samsung dominating Android with 8 of the current top 10 devices
  • Steve Wozniak: Samsung is a "big competitor" and Apple is "somewhat behind"
  • Samsung Qi wireless charging pad spotted in FCC filing
[via SlashGear]
Share
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 with Android 4.3 spotted in benchmark results
  • Verizon HTC One "will be announced later"
  • Verizon HTC One tipped for CTIA event unveiling

Tags: AndroidAppleGoogleSamsungSteve Jobs

  • Azzras

    He says that now because he knows he is losing the ‘thermonuclear war’.

  • Evan Wickes

    he had the power to end this months ago & its still ongoing. he may not have wanted it, but he obviously isnt opposed to it.

    • Chahk Noir

      He can’t back out now without losing face, not to mention all that money already invested in the lawyering so far. It may be throwing good money after bad, but Cook is stuck with it.

      • Evan Wickes

        yes, he would lose face. this means the stock price would go down. i understand not pulling out now, but he had plenty of time to pull out before Apple’s first court appearance. He was the CEO for over a year (guestimate) from the time of Jobs to the first court case.

  • Search

  • REVIEWS

    • AT&T LG Optimus G Pro ReviewAT&T LG Optimus G Pro Review
    • Iron Man 3 game Review: what you need to knowIron Man 3 game Review: what you need to know
    • Samsung GALAXY S 4 ReviewSamsung GALAXY S 4 Review
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 ReviewSamsung Galaxy Note 8.0 Review
    • Pebble review: Two weeks with a smartwatchPebble review: Two weeks with a smartwatch
  • HANDS-ON & QUICK LOOKS

    • Coolpad Quattro II 4G and 8920 hands-onCoolpad Quattro II 4G and 8920 hands-on
    • Kyocera Hydro XTRM and EDGE hands-onKyocera Hydro XTRM and EDGE hands-on
    • Opera for Android exits beta, we go hands onOpera for Android exits beta, we go hands on


  • T-Mobile G1 Accessories
  • RECENT COMMENTS

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise

Copyright 2013 Android Community